Tim Adams, the CEO of the Institute of International Finance (IIF), emphasized that the recent upheaval in the banking sector, which saw the collapse of institutions like Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, did not amount to a systemic crisis. Adams clarified that while there was a period of market turbulence, it did not qualify as a crisis. The stabilization of markets led many to believe that the issues were isolated to the affected banks and did not pose a widespread risk to the system.
The IIF, a global organization representing the financial services industry with over 400 members across 60 countries, is particularly focused on the potential downside risks to economic growth, especially in advanced economies. The repercussions of the aforementioned bank failures had a negative impact on the economic prospects of various advanced economies.
In response to this situation, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) adjusted its five-year global growth forecast to approximately 3%, the lowest medium-term projection in an IMF World Economic Outlook report since 1990. Regulators in the United States and Europe acted swiftly to address contagion risks following the multiple banking collapses last month. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen reassured that the banking system remains adequately capitalized with sufficient liquidity.
Tim Adams, CEO of the Institute of International Finance, referred to the March chaos as a “period of market turmoil or turbulence,” downplaying it as not constituting a “crisis.” https://t.co/vujLOssook
— NBC4 Washington (@nbcwashington) April 12, 2023
Despite the stabilization observed in the markets, Adams emphasized the importance of remaining vigilant and staying alert to potential stresses within the system. The genuine downside risks continue to be a significant concern for the IIF and its members. Adams mentioned that many regulators he had discussions with, some of whom were instrumental in shaping the Dodd-Frank and Basel III frameworks post the financial crisis, did not see a need for significant regulatory alterations this time around.
In essence, even though the recent banking turmoil did not meet the criteria of a crisis, the lurking downside risks are actual, necessitating ongoing vigilance. The IIF and its members are committed to closely monitoring the evolving scenario and advocating for strategies that mitigate systemic risks while fostering growth in the financial services sector.
Image Source: Worldnewsera
